Skip to content

πŸ€– [VISION - Not MVP] ML-Driven Pattern Recognition

Timeline: Year 2, after 1000+ assessments Current Status: Concept only Warning: Do not implement during MVP phase

Concept

Machine learning system that identifies compliance patterns, risk correlations, and optimization opportunities across organizations.

Evolution from MVP

MVP Approach (Current)

  • Hardcoded risk patterns
  • Manual categorization
  • Static scoring rules
  • Template-based insights

Vision Approach (Future)

  • ML-discovered patterns
  • Auto-categorization
  • Dynamic risk scoring
  • Personalized insights

Pattern Recognition Capabilities

1. Risk Pattern Discovery

# Future capability
class RiskPatternML:
    def identify_patterns(self, org_data):
        # Discover correlations like:
        # "Companies without MFA have 3x higher incident rates"
        # "Organizations with recent funding often fail E8_G"

2. Question Intelligence

  • Predict which questions matter most
  • Skip questions based on prior answers
  • Identify question clusters
  • Optimize assessment flows

3. Compliance Prediction

  • Forecast compliance trajectory
  • Predict audit failures
  • Identify intervention points
  • Suggest proactive measures

4. Industry Benchmarking

  • Peer comparison models
  • Industry-specific risks
  • Size-based expectations
  • Maturity progression paths

Data Requirements

Minimum Viable Dataset

  • 1000+ completed assessments
  • 50+ organizations per industry
  • 12+ months of historical data
  • Validated outcome data

Training Approach

  1. Start with supervised learning on known patterns
  2. Move to unsupervised discovery
  3. Implement reinforcement learning for recommendations
  4. Continuous model improvement

Technical Architecture

ML Pipeline

Data Collection β†’ Feature Engineering β†’ Model Training β†’ Validation β†’ Deployment
      ↓                    ↓                ↓              ↓            ↓
   Privacy             Eng Team          ML Team      Compliance    Product
   Review            Resources         Resources       Review      Integration

Technology Stack

  • Framework: TensorFlow/PyTorch
  • Pipeline: Kubeflow/MLflow
  • Serving: TensorFlow Serving
  • Monitoring: Weights & Biases

Privacy & Ethics

Critical Considerations

  • No PII in training data
  • Aggregated insights only
  • Explicit consent required
  • Right to opt-out
  • Transparent model decisions

Compliance Requirements

  • Privacy Act compliance
  • GDPR considerations
  • Industry regulations
  • Ethical AI principles

Business Value

For Customers

  • Faster assessments (50% reduction)
  • Better risk identification
  • Proactive recommendations
  • Industry insights

For GetCimple

  • Competitive differentiation
  • Premium tier justification
  • Reduced support burden
  • Network effects moat

Implementation Phases

Phase 1: Data Foundation (Month 1-3)

  • Implement comprehensive logging
  • Design feature schema
  • Build data pipeline
  • Privacy framework

Phase 2: Basic Models (Month 4-6)

  • Risk classification
  • Question routing
  • Simple predictions
  • A/B testing

Phase 3: Advanced Models (Month 7-12)

  • Pattern discovery
  • Complex predictions
  • Personalization
  • Full rollout

Success Metrics

  • Model accuracy: >85%
  • False positive rate: <10%
  • User trust score: >4.5/5
  • Time savings: >50%

Investment Requirements

  • Team: 2 ML engineers, 1 data engineer
  • Infrastructure: GPU compute, data warehouse
  • Timeline: 12 months
  • Budget: [Post-Series A]

Risk Factors

  • Insufficient data quality
  • Model bias concerns
  • Regulatory changes
  • User acceptance

Evolution Trigger

Implement when:

  • 1000+ assessments completed
  • Clear patterns validated manually
  • ML team hired
  • Privacy framework approved

Note: This vision aligns with our philosophy of "accumulated intelligence as competitive moat" but requires significant data and resources not available during MVP.