π€ [VISION - Not MVP] ML-Driven Pattern Recognition¶
Timeline: Year 2, after 1000+ assessments Current Status: Concept only Warning: Do not implement during MVP phase
Concept¶
Machine learning system that identifies compliance patterns, risk correlations, and optimization opportunities across organizations.
Evolution from MVP¶
MVP Approach (Current)¶
- Hardcoded risk patterns
- Manual categorization
- Static scoring rules
- Template-based insights
Vision Approach (Future)¶
- ML-discovered patterns
- Auto-categorization
- Dynamic risk scoring
- Personalized insights
Pattern Recognition Capabilities¶
1. Risk Pattern Discovery¶
# Future capability
class RiskPatternML:
def identify_patterns(self, org_data):
# Discover correlations like:
# "Companies without MFA have 3x higher incident rates"
# "Organizations with recent funding often fail E8_G"
2. Question Intelligence¶
- Predict which questions matter most
- Skip questions based on prior answers
- Identify question clusters
- Optimize assessment flows
3. Compliance Prediction¶
- Forecast compliance trajectory
- Predict audit failures
- Identify intervention points
- Suggest proactive measures
4. Industry Benchmarking¶
- Peer comparison models
- Industry-specific risks
- Size-based expectations
- Maturity progression paths
Data Requirements¶
Minimum Viable Dataset¶
- 1000+ completed assessments
- 50+ organizations per industry
- 12+ months of historical data
- Validated outcome data
Training Approach¶
- Start with supervised learning on known patterns
- Move to unsupervised discovery
- Implement reinforcement learning for recommendations
- Continuous model improvement
Technical Architecture¶
ML Pipeline¶
Data Collection β Feature Engineering β Model Training β Validation β Deployment
β β β β β
Privacy Eng Team ML Team Compliance Product
Review Resources Resources Review Integration
Technology Stack¶
- Framework: TensorFlow/PyTorch
- Pipeline: Kubeflow/MLflow
- Serving: TensorFlow Serving
- Monitoring: Weights & Biases
Privacy & Ethics¶
Critical Considerations¶
- No PII in training data
- Aggregated insights only
- Explicit consent required
- Right to opt-out
- Transparent model decisions
Compliance Requirements¶
- Privacy Act compliance
- GDPR considerations
- Industry regulations
- Ethical AI principles
Business Value¶
For Customers¶
- Faster assessments (50% reduction)
- Better risk identification
- Proactive recommendations
- Industry insights
For GetCimple¶
- Competitive differentiation
- Premium tier justification
- Reduced support burden
- Network effects moat
Implementation Phases¶
Phase 1: Data Foundation (Month 1-3)¶
- Implement comprehensive logging
- Design feature schema
- Build data pipeline
- Privacy framework
Phase 2: Basic Models (Month 4-6)¶
- Risk classification
- Question routing
- Simple predictions
- A/B testing
Phase 3: Advanced Models (Month 7-12)¶
- Pattern discovery
- Complex predictions
- Personalization
- Full rollout
Success Metrics¶
- Model accuracy: >85%
- False positive rate: <10%
- User trust score: >4.5/5
- Time savings: >50%
Investment Requirements¶
- Team: 2 ML engineers, 1 data engineer
- Infrastructure: GPU compute, data warehouse
- Timeline: 12 months
- Budget: [Post-Series A]
Risk Factors¶
- Insufficient data quality
- Model bias concerns
- Regulatory changes
- User acceptance
Evolution Trigger¶
Implement when:
- 1000+ assessments completed
- Clear patterns validated manually
- ML team hired
- Privacy framework approved
Note: This vision aligns with our philosophy of "accumulated intelligence as competitive moat" but requires significant data and resources not available during MVP.