π AI Resource Efficiency Checklistt¶
π― Purpose¶
A one-page checklist to help GetCimple's 3-person team assess and optimize resource usage for AI features, ensuring smart allocation of time, money, and attention.
π° Cost Assessment¶
Before Implementation¶
- Estimated monthly API costs: $__
- Development time budget: _ hours
- Maintenance time per month: _ hours
- Cost per user served: $__
Cost Thresholds (Red Flags)¶
- β Monthly AI costs > $100 for MVP
- β Development time > 16 hours (2 days)
- β Monthly maintenance > 4 hours
- β Cost per user > $5/month
Cost Optimization Checks¶
- β Using cheapest model that works (Haiku vs Sonnet)?
- β Caching responses for common queries?
- β Rate limiting to prevent runaway costs?
- β Using n8n workflows instead of custom code?
β±οΈ Time Investment¶
Development Time Reality Check¶
- Can we build MVP in <2 days? (If no, break down further)
- Do we understand the AI API well? (If no, add learning time)
- Is the integration straightforward? (If no, consider simpler approach)
- Can we reuse existing patterns? (Check implementation-patterns.md)
Time Optimization Strategies¶
- β Starting with existing n8n templates?
- β Using AI patterns we've implemented before?
- β Copying workflows from similar features?
- β Planning for iterative improvement vs perfect first version?
π§ Cognitive Load Assessment¶
Team Capacity Check¶
- Are we already working on 2+ major features? (If yes, defer)
- Do we have bandwidth for debugging AI quirks?
- Can we handle additional support questions?
- Will this create ongoing decision fatigue?
Complexity Indicators (Warning Signs)¶
- β οΈ Requires training or fine-tuning models
- β οΈ Needs complex prompt engineering
- β οΈ Involves chaining multiple AI calls
- β οΈ Requires domain expertise we don't have
π Value Justification¶
User Impact Metrics¶
- Time saved per user per week: _ minutes
- Number of users affected: _
- Total time saved across users: _ hours/week
- Value of time saved: $_ per week
Value Thresholds¶
- β Saves users >15 minutes per week each
- β Affects >50% of active users
- β Value of time saved > Cost of implementation
- β Reduces support questions or manual work
π§ Technical Resource Check¶
Infrastructure Requirements¶
- Uses existing APIs/services? (Anthropic, n8n, Supabase)
- Fits within current hosting? (Cloudflare Workers)
- No new dependencies or services?
- Can leverage existing authentication?
Maintenance Considerations¶
- Auto-scales without manual intervention?
- Has clear error handling and fallbacks?
- Monitoring/alerts set up?
- Documentation for future team members?
π¨ Resource Warning Signs¶
Stop Implementation If:¶
- π Combined scores indicate >20 hours total work
- π Monthly costs would exceed $50 for <numerous users
- π Requires learning new frameworks or tools
- π Can't clearly explain value to users in one sentence
- π Team is already stretched on 3+ concurrent projects
Proceed with Caution If:¶
- β οΈ Implementation time 8-15 hours
- β οΈ Monthly costs $25-50
- β οΈ Affects <30% of users
- β οΈ Value is primarily "nice to have"
β Green Light Indicators¶
Ideal AI Feature Characteristics:¶
- π’ Implementation time <8 hours
- π’ Monthly costs <$25
- π’ Uses familiar tools (n8n, Claude API)
- π’ Saves users significant time weekly
- π’ Fits existing workflows seamlessly
- π’ Can start simple and improve incrementally
π Pre-Implementation Checklistt¶
Before starting any AI feature:
- Cost-benefit analysis completed and favorable
- Implementation approach selected from patterns
- Success metrics defined (time saved, user satisfaction, etc.)
- Fallback plan if AI fails (manual process, simpler alternative)
- Resource budget approved by team
- Integration points identified and tested
π― Quick Decision Matrix¶
| Factor | Weight | Score (1-5) | Weighted Score |
|---|---|---|---|
| User time saved | 3x | _ | _ |
| Implementation simplicity | 2x | _ | _ |
| Cost efficiency | 2x | _ | _ |
| Team capacity fit | 2x | _ | _ |
| Maintenance burden | 1x | _ | _ |
| Total | **_** |
Scoring Guide:
- 5: Excellent (major time savings, very simple, very cheap)
- 3: Good (moderate benefits, reasonable effort/cost)
- 1: Poor (minimal benefits, complex, expensive)
Decision Thresholds:
- Score 30+: Implement immediately
- Score 20-29: Implement if capacity allows
- Score <20: Defer or find simpler approach
π‘ Remember¶
The best AI feature is one that users love and doesn't stress the team. When resource allocation is unclear, start smaller or defer until it is.