Skip to content

Strategic Audit Summary - October 13, 2025

Audit Type: Multi-agent strategic review (quick pass) Conducted By: AI agents (ThinkDeep, CodeReview, Chat) + Human orchestration Duration: ~45 minutes Scope: MVP scope validation, documentation quality, technical sanity check

Executive Summary

Overall Assessment: MVP direction is solid, but 3 critical issues identified:

  1. ✅ RESOLVED: Database schema conflict (3 conflicting schemas)
  2. ⚠️ CRITICAL: MVP scope includes non-MVP features (AI orchestration, gamification)
  3. ⚠️ HIGH: Customer documentation severely underdeveloped (3 files vs 190 internal)

Verdict: Current documented MVP specs are 3-5x too large for 3-person team in 3-6 months. Requires radical scope reduction.

Key Findings by Workstream

1. MVP Scope Analysis (ThinkDeep Agent)

Finding: Severe scope misalignment between stated principles and technical specs

What You Say: - "Simplicity Above All" - "Build simple, ship fast, validate with real users" - 3-person team, 3-6 month timeline

What Specs Actually Describe: - ❌ Multi-agent AI orchestration platform (6+ months of work) - ❌ Kubernetes deployment (entire stack is otherwise serverless) - ❌ Gamification system (achievements, feedback loops) - ❌ Complex policy versioning with templates/instances/archives - ❌ Planned throwaway work (Stripe → Kinde billing migration)

Recommendation: Radical scope reduction needed. Defer all AI, gamification, and complex features to post-MVP.

2. Documentation Quality Audit (CodeReview Agent)

Overall Score: 7.5/10

Strengths: - ✅ World-class Context Separation Guide - ✅ Excellent CLAUDE.md hierarchy - ✅ 190 comprehensive internal docs - ✅ Sophisticated validation tooling - ✅ Clear MVP boundaries in internal docs

Critical Gap: - ❌ Customer docs essentially non-existent (3 placeholder files) - ❌ This suggests unvalidated assumptions about what customers need - ❌ Violates "documentation-first" principle

Other Issues: - 12 broken internal links - "Essential Eight" vs "E8" terminology inconsistency - Some spec links point to wrong directory paths

Key Insight: Team has thoroughly documented how they think about building for boards but hasn't documented what boards will actually use.

3. Technical Architecture Review (Chat Agent)

Assessment: Core tech stack is solid (React 19, Supabase, Cloudflare) but specs are bloated

Priority Concerns:

  1. Extreme Over-Engineering in AI Features 🚨
  2. AI agent orchestration spec describes platform-level architecture
  3. Would require dedicated team + months of work

  4. Directly contradicts "Simplicity Above All"

  5. Conflicting Database Specifications 🚨 ✅ RESOLVED

  6. Schema defined in 3 different places with conflicting designs

  7. ✅ FIXED: Created unified MVP schema at /specs/mvp/database/schema.md

  8. Technology Mismatch ⚠️

  9. Entire stack is serverless but AI specs introduce Kubernetes

  10. Massive operational complexity for 3-person team

  11. Planned Throwaway Work ⚠️

  12. Build custom Stripe integration, then migrate to Kinde

  13. Inefficient use of limited resources

  14. Scope Creep Features ⚠️

  15. Gamification = "Vitamin, not Painkiller"
  16. Defer post-MVP

Actions Taken

✅ Quick Win: Database Schema Resolution

Problem: 3 conflicting database schemas causing confusion

Solution Implemented: 1. Created unified MVP schema: /specs/mvp/database/schema.md 2. Moved old schemas to /specs/post-mvp/database/alternatives/ 3. Added deprecation notices and README explaining why

New Schema Features: - Policy template library (20 policies: Standard 12, Complete 20) - Variables (text) + Parameters (config options) - Board approval workflow for version updates - Granular E8 evidence (E8_1_ML1 through E8_8_ML3) - Multi-tenant with RLS - Simplified from over-engineered v2, enhanced from too-simple v1

Alignment: Schema now matches recent policy pack work (Standard/Complete packs, template-based, minimal customization)

Outstanding Issues

Critical (Requires Immediate Action)

  1. Scope Reduction Needed
  2. Move AI specs to /specs/post-mvp/
  3. Move gamification to /specs/post-mvp/

  4. Clearly mark what's MVP vs future

  5. Customer Documentation Gap

  6. Decision: Parked for now (user choice)

  7. Need to create minimal customer docs before launch

  8. Fix Broken Links

  9. 12 broken internal links found
  10. Run npm run docs:fix:links or manual fixes

High (Address Soon)

  1. Terminology Consistency
  2. "Essential Eight" vs "E8" - decide on standard

  3. Update consistency rules accordingly

  4. Strategy Documentation Updates

  5. Incomplete index in strategy section
  6. Outdated question counts
  7. Stale dates in documents

Medium

  1. Spec Validation
  2. Ensure all remaining /specs/ files are actually MVP scope
  3. Move post-MVP features to appropriate directory

Recommendations

Core Features: 1. Essential Eight Compliance Dashboard - Current E8 maturity level display - Manual status entry (no auto-detection) - Simple traffic light visualization

  1. Policy Management (Template-Based)
  2. 20-policy library (Standard 12, Complete 20)
  3. Variable + parameter customization
  4. Board approval workflow

  5. Version update management

  6. E8 Evidence Collection

  7. Upload docs/PDFs/images/screenshots
  8. Free-form notes, who, date, ticket number

  9. Granular control tracking (E8_1_ML1 format)

  10. Simple Board Report Export

  11. PDF export of E8 status
  12. Professional formatting

  13. Pre-built templates

  14. Basic User Management

  15. Kinde auth
  16. Roles: Admin, Director, Manager, User
  17. Multi-tenant with RLS

Defer to Post-MVP: - ❌ All AI orchestration - ❌ LLM query systems - ❌ Gamification - ❌ Complex implementation progress tracking - ❌ Policy archives (keep minimal version history)

Success Metrics

Audit Objectives Achieved: - ✅ Validated customer feedback (policies wanted, board directors keen) - ✅ Identified scope bloat (AI, gamification not MVP) - ✅ Resolved database schema conflict - ✅ Documented documentation gaps - ✅ Provided actionable recommendations

Customer Validation Confirms: - ✅ Real customers want the policies - ✅ Board directors are interested - ✅ Template-based approach is correct (not importing existing policies) - ✅ 3-6 month timeline is realistic for focused MVP

Next Steps

  1. Immediate (This Week):
  2. Create unified database schema ✅ DONE
  3. Move AI specs to /specs/post-mvp/
  4. Move gamification to /specs/post-mvp/

  5. Fix 12 broken internal links

  6. Short Term (Next 2 Weeks):

  7. Update strategy docs (index, dates, E8 export decision)
  8. Validate remaining specs are truly MVP scope

  9. Decide on "Essential Eight" vs "E8" terminology

  10. Medium Term (Before MVP Launch):

  11. Create minimal customer documentation
  12. Update MVP feature list to match reduced scope
  13. Document deferred features with rationale

Conclusion

The audit revealed that GetCimple has: - ✅ Solid foundation: Good tech stack, clear vision, validated customer need - ✅ Strong internal docs: Excellent context separation, comprehensive planning - ⚠️ Scope creep: Specs include platform-level features not viable for MVP - ⚠️ Documentation gap: Internal docs 63x larger than customer docs

Key Takeaway: Focus on the validated core (policy templates + E8 compliance) and ruthlessly defer everything else. The vision is sound, but execution needs tighter focus.

Database Schema Status: ✅ RESOLVED - Single source of truth established

Audit Team: - ThinkDeep Agent (openai/gpt-5-pro) - Strategic analysis - CodeReview Agent (Claude Sonnet 4.5) - Documentation quality - Chat Agent (google/gemini-2.5-pro) - Technical review - Human Orchestrator - Synthesis and decision-making

Next Audit Recommended: After MVP scope reduction implementation (2-4 weeks)